Appeal No. 2003-1474 Application No. 09/024,631 However, the rejection at issue is an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Here, the examiner has provided motivation for making the combination (the external heads of Driessen are said to reduce grazing of the skin), and the two cited references are clearly in the same field of endeavor. The claimed subject matter is clearly disclosed by the combination, and the appellants have provided no compelling evidence or argument otherwise. Accordingly, this rejection is affirmed. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007