Ex Parte BANG - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

             Paper No. 40                                                                                           

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                          Ex parte YOUNG UN BANG                                                    
             ____________                                                                                           
               Appeal No. 2003-1519                                                                                 
                                          Application No. 09/109,884                                                
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                     
                                                                                                                   
             Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
             LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                
                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner                       
             refusing to allow claims 1, 3, 5, 7 through 17, 19 through 24 and 26 through 37 which                  
             are all the claims pending in this application.                                                        
                        THE INVENTION                                                                               

             The invention is directed to a liquid crystal display (LCD)apparatus wherein the                       
             front surface of the LCD module is covered with a metal frame.  The LCD module has an                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007