Appeal No. 2003-1519 5
Application No. 09/109,884
In view of the fact that the examiner did not rely upon Kim to remedy the
limitations of claim 5 that appear in claim 1, we need not consider the Kim reference.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1, 3, 17, 19, 23, 26, 30 through 32 and 34 through
37 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Yeager in view of Plesinger is
reversed.
The rejection of claims 5, 7, 24 and under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being
unpatentable over Yeager in view of Plesinger and further in view of Kim is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007