Ex Parte YOUNES - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                                                                                             Paper No. 26              

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                              Ex parte MAGDY YOUNES                                                    
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2003-1548                                                  
                                              Application No. 08/786,957                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before COHEN, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-8,                   
              which are all of the claims pending in this application.  An amendment after final (see                  
              Paper No. 20) has been entered.                                                                          
                     We REVERSE.                                                                                       
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The appellant’s invention relates to an endotracheal tube for patient ventilation                 
              and for measuring airway pressure.  Further understanding of the invention may be                        






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007