Ex Parte Aulick - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-1554                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 09/552,063                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellant's invention relates to a self-contained hydraulic power unit which                     
              does not require hydraulic power supplied from an external source and which may be                          
              used on a grain trailer or the like to power the lift cylinder on the dump unit, power the                  
              conveyor, power the hydraulic floor or power the end gate (specification, page 1).  A                       
              copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                      
                     The examiner relied upon the following prior art references of record in rejecting                   
              the appealed claims:                                                                                        
              Bullinger                                  3,834,767                    Sep. 10, 1974                       
              Nelson                                     3,866,935                    Feb. 18, 1975                       
              Bobka                                      4,030,751                    Jun. 21, 1977                       
              Streeter                                   4,141,582                    Feb. 27, 1979                       
              Hamel                                      4,351,377                    Sep. 28, 1982                       
              Tharaldson                                 5,409,344                    Apr. 25, 1995                       
              Anderson, Jr. et al. (Anderson)            5,551,796                    Sep.  3, 1996                       
              Clark                                      5,839,568                    Nov. 24, 1998                       
                     The following rejections are before us for review.                                                   
                     Claims 1-3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                        
              Hamel in view of Anderson, Nelson and Bullinger.                                                            
                     Claims 4 and 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                  
              unpatentable over Hamel in view of Anderson, Nelson and Bullinger and further in view                       
              of Streeter.                                                                                                










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007