Appeal No. 2003-1681
Application No. 09/320,780
Grounds of Rejection
1. Claims 1-4, 9, 10, 12-17 and 19-21 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka
and Kaijou.
2. Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka and Kaijou and
further in view of Quintens ‘924.
3. Claims 5-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka and Kaijou and
further in view of Ashton.
4. Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka and Kaijou and
further in view of Majumdar.
5. Claims 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka and Kaijou and
further in view of Majumdar ‘083.
6. Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Quintens in view of Otsuka and Ashton.
We affirm as to all six grounds of rejections.
Background
The invention relates to a water-borne ceramer composition
which may be cured to form an abrasive resistant, electrically
conductive ceramer. Claim 1. The composition of the invention
comprises water having dispersed or dissolved therein (1) a
silica sol comprising a plurality of colloidal silica particles,
(2) a binder precursor and (3) an electrically conductive organic
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007