The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RODGERS P. DEJARNETTE,Jr.
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1825
Application No. 09/672,492
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRATZ, DELMENDO and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-3, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 16. Claims 4-6, 9, 10
and 13-15, which are all of the other claims pending in this
application, have been indicated as allowable by the examiner but
stand objected to as being dependent on a rejected base claim
(answer, page 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007