Ex Parte DeJarnette - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1825                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/672,492                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to a coupling device that may            
          be used for adding a shoulder stock to a handgun.  An                       
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of             
          exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                               
                    1. A coupling device for interaction between an                   
               elongated object of police equipment and a handgun                     
               whose hand grip has a recess, said coupling device                     
               comprising:                                                            
                      a) a rigid mounting ring comprised of a                         
                 sidewall of flat band configuration that defines a                   
                 circular interior aperture having a center axis,                     
                 circular outer wall, forward and rearward edges,                     
                 and upper and lower extremities,                                     
                      b) a prong attached to said upper extremity                     
                 and directed forwardly of said forward edge in                       
                 parallel relationship to the axis of said interior                   
                 aperture, and                                                        
                      c) manually operable securing means                             
                 interactive with said sidewall at said lower                         
                 extremity to permit controlled engagement with an                    
                 object disposed within said interior aperture.                       
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Brookhyser                    2,539,008           Jan. 23, 1951             
          Martel                        5,787,630           Aug. 04, 1998             

               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being              
          anticipated by Brookhyser.  Claims 2, 3, 7, 8, 11 an d 12 stand             
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Brookhyser in view of Martel.                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007