Appeal No. 2003-1869 Application 09/622,092 3 and 5. Hence, the examiner’s determination that the subject matter recited in these claims is anticipated by Mergenthaler cannot stand. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of independent claims 3 and 5, and dependent claim 4, as being anticipated by Mergenthaler. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 3 through 5 is reversed. REVERSED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) ) APPEALS AND LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) ) JOHN P. MCQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JPM/kis 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007