Ex Parte CULLISON et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1906                                                        
          Application No. 09/458,623                                                  


               polyamide homopolymer or a polyamide copolymer, which                  
               first outer layer is attached to one side of an inner                  
               layer which consists essentially of an ethylene vinyl                  
               alcohol copolymer, which inner layer is attached on                    
               another side to at least one second outer layer                        
               independently comprising a polyamide homopolymer or a                  
               polyamide copolymer.                                                   
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Grant                              4,301,216      Nov. 17, 1981             
          Knott II et al. (Knott)            4,355,721      Oct. 26, 1982             
          Takanashi                          4,537,305      Aug. 27, 1985             
          Schreck et al. (Schreck)           5,716,698      Feb. 10, 1986             
          Dallmann et al. (Dallmann)         4,572,854      Feb. 25, 1986             
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to an opaque,                
          peelable lid for a container, which comprises first and second              
          outer layers of a polyamide homopolymer or a copolymer, and an              
          inner layer of an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer.  The first              
          and second outer layers and inner layer are formed by a                     
          coextrusion process.                                                        
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          follows:                                                                    
               (a) claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13-19, 21, 22, 24, 27-29, 33             
          and 35-37 over Takanashi in view of Knott and Schreck.                      
               (b) claims 3, 7 and 20 over the stated combination of                  
          references further in view of Dallmann, and                                 


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007