Appeal No. 2003-1906 Application No. 09/458,623 [p]rocesses for producing these laminates are well known. If two thermoplastics are compatible, they can be combined by coextrusion to form a composite structure or laminated by melting the surfaces of the layers in contact with one another and by applying pressure. If the two thermoplastics are not compatible they can be made into a laminate by placing an adhesive layer between the incompatible layers. (page 2, lines 8-13). Accordingly, we are convinced that, based upon the collective teachings of Takanashi and Knott, as well as the state of the prior art, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to make the laminated lid of Takanashi by a coextrusion process. Appellants also contend that Takanashi provides no teachings that the lid may be opaque. However, while Takanashi teaches that the layers of the lid are transparent and allow the contents to be readily inspected, we concur with the examiner that Schreck evidences the obviousness of adding a pigment to at least one of the layers of the film to protect the contents from radiation, if so desired. We find no error in the examiner’s reasoning that the decision for one of ordinary skill in the art to opacify the lid is contingent upon its intended use. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007