Ex Parte KNAUER et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1968                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/327,963                                                  


          20-40/ angle.  An understanding of the invention can be derived             
          from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.             
                    1. A gas-phase fluidized-bed reactor for                          
               polymerizing ethylenically unsaturated monomers,                       
               comprising a reactor space (1) in the form of a vertical               
               tube, a calming zone (2) adjoining the upper part of the               
               reactor sapce, a circulated gas line (3) in fluid                      
               communication with said calming zone, a circulated gas                 
               compressor (4) and a cooling apparatus (5) in fluid                    
               communication with said circulated gas line, a gas                     
               distributor plate (6) which forms the lower boundary of                
               the reactor space and, optionally, a flow divider (7)                  
               below the gas distributor plate, in fluid communication                
               with said circulated gas line, wherein the gas                         
               distributor plate (6) has a plurality of gas flow                      
               orifices (8) whose outlet sides are widened conically at               
               an angle " of from 20 to 40°.                                          

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Jenkins, III et al. (Jenkins)      4,588,790      May 13, 1986              
          Chang et al. (Chang)               5,905,094      May 18, 1999              
               Claims 1, 3-6 and 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jenkins in view of Chang.               
               We refer to the brief and to the answer for a complete                 
          exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by appellants and           
          the examiner concerning the issues before us on this appeal.                
                                       OPINION                                        










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007