The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte FRANK D. EGITTO, MICHAEL A. GAYNES, RAMESH R. KODNANI, LUIS J. MATIENZO and MARK V. PIERSON _______________ Appeal No. 2003-2014 Application No. 09/757,185 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 11-13 and 26-29. The only other claims remaining in the application, which are claims 14, 15 and 25, stand objected to by the examiner but otherwise allowable. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007