Ex Parte HOURTICOLON et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-2033                                                        
          Application No. 09/154,130                                                  


          substantially vertical reactor, and claim a substantially                   
          vertical reactor which contains the liquid distributor.                     
          Claims 10 and 12, directed toward the liquid distributor, are               
          illustrative:                                                               
               10.  A liquid distributor adapted for use inside a                     
               substantially vertical reactor containing a fixed bed                  
               catalyst wherein the liquid distributor is in the form                 
               of a channel distributor comprising a drainage outlet                  
               and having a cleaning mechanism comprising a cleaning                  
               element which can be lowered into the opening of said                  
               drainage outlet, and wherein the cleaning element is                   
               attached to a holder, said holder contained within a                   
               guide for vertical displacement.                                       
               12. A liquid distributor adapted for use inside a                      
               substantially vertical reactor containing a fixed bed                  
               catalyst wherein said distributor is designed to be                    
               positioned in the reactor and said distributor is in                   
               the form of a channel distributor containing a drainage                
               outlet and a cleaning mechanism containing at least one                
               pin for cleaning the drainage outlet.                                  
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Keller et al. (Keller)             4,569,364       Feb. 11, 1986            
          Muldowney et al. (Muldowney)       5,484,578       Jan. 16, 1996            
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 10-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being             
          unpatentable over Muldowney in view of Keller.                              






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007