Appeal No. 2004-0049 Page 2 Application No. 10/047,626 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to improved golf balls comprising multi-layer covers which have a hard inner layer and a relatively soft outer layer (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Nesbitt 4,431,193 Feb. 14, 1984 Isaac 5,000,459 Mar. 19, 1991 Horiuchi et al. (Horiuchi) 5,222,739 June 29, 1993 Claims 14 to 17, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nesbitt in view of Horiuchi and the appellant's disclosure. Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nesbitt in view of Horiuchi, the appellant's disclosure and Isaac. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 14, mailed July 2, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007