Ex Parte O'REILLY et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0227                                                        
          Application 09/140,151                                                      

                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a system and a method for providing a             
          substrate with security information.  Claim 11, directed toward             
          the system, is illustrative:                                                
               11. A system for providing a substrate with a security                 
          identification comprising:                                                  
               a security signature comprised of a random distribution of             
          dielectric components affixed with said substrate, said                     
          dielectric components having a dielectric constant sufficiently             
          larger than that of said substrate as to exhibit molecular level            
          electric dipole moments, that cause a detectable modification of            
          an external electric field passing through said substrate in                
          accordance with said distribution; and                                      
               a security signature detector configured to couple an                  
          electric field with said substrate, and being operative to                  
          measure a modification of said electric field by said random                
          distribution of dielectric components, and to store information             
          representative of said modification.                                        
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Brosow et al. (Brosow)               4,218,674     Aug. 19, 1980            
          Stockburger et al. (Stockburger)     4,816,657     Mar. 28, 1989            
          Matsumoto et al. (Matsumoto)         4,970,495     Nov. 13, 1990            
          Hasegawa et al. (Hasegawa)           6,072,394     Jun.  6, 2000            
          (filed Feb. 29, 1996)                                                       
          Verschuur et al. (Verschuur)         6,168,080     Jan.  2, 2001            
          (filed Apr. 14, 1998)                                                       
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:            
          claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8-11, 13, 14 and 16-18 over Verschuur in                 
          combination with Brosow and/or Stockburger, and claims 7 and 15             

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007