GODISKA et al v. GRAY - Page 11




              Interference 104,002                                                                                             
              These results indicate the usefulness of the polynucleotide sequence encoded by                                  
              MN390 in differentiating colon tissue of a Crohn’s disease patient from normal colon                             
              tissue.  Accordingly, we find that Godiska had an actual reduction to practice on March                          
              3, 1995.                                                                                                         
                      In view of our finding with respect to the polynucleotide sequence of the MN390                          
              clone, we need not reach Godiska’s arguments with respect to the utility of the                                  
              polypeptide having the amino acid sequence of residues 25 to 93 of Godiska’s SEQ                                 
              ID NO: 2.                                                                                                        
                      Since Li is only entitled to its constructive reduction to practice date of June 15,                     
              1995, we hold that Godiska prevails over Li with respect to priority.                                            







              V.      Judgment                                                                                                 
                      In view of the foregoing, judgment as to the subject matter of the count is hereby                       
              awarded to junior party RONALD GODISKA and PATRICK W. GRAY.                                                      
                      Accordingly, on the present record,                                                                      
                      RONALD GODISKA and PATRICK W. GRAY are entitled to a patent containing                                   
              claims 1-12 and 17-20, corresponding to the count; and                                                           
                      senior party, HAODONG LI and GEORGE SEIBEL, is a not entitled to a patent                                
              containing claims 21-52, corresponding to the count.                                                             
                                                              11                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007