Interference No. 104,829 Paper200 Young v. Crornfish Page 2 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 188, p. 2), the sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior party DONALD A. YOUNG, MICHAEL K. O'BANION and VIRGINIA D. WINN; FURTHER ORDERED that junior party DONALD A. YOUNG, MICHAEL K. O'BANION and VIRGINIA D. WINN is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-9, 12 22, 25-28, 30, 32-38 and 58 (corresponding to Count 1) of application 08/487,752; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision (Paper 200) and of the ORDER REDECLARING INTERFERENCE mailed November 21, 2002 (Paper 188) be given paper numbers and entered in the administrative record of Young application 08/487,752, of Cromlish U.S. Patent 5,543,297 and of Cromlish reissue application 09/731,632; and FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661. TıICHARD E. SCHAFEP/ Administrative Patent Judge BOARD OF PATENT CAROL A. RVEG5L APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES SALLY C.NEDLEY Administrative Patent JudgePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007