CROMLISH et al. V. YOUNG et al. - Page 5

         01/31/03 FRI 10:19 FAX 703 836 278T OLIFF & BERRIDGE. FLc Q002                                               

               7nterference No. 104,289 Young v. Cromlish                                                             
                     Without conr.eding priority as to the count or unpatqntability as to any claim Of the            
               Young application in interference, Party Young hereby abandons the contest of the interference         
               and requests entry of adverse judgment.                                                                

                                                            Respectfully submitted,                                   



                                                            Wi 'am P. BZerridge, eg. No. 30,0                         
                                                                           -4 4o,  530,ý                              
                                                         A 7Melanie L Mealy, Reg. No. 40,*ý Rege   e Y, 0,085                                    




























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007