Interference No. 104,403
57. Rosenthal alleges in his affidavit that, as Conley was acting as a
representative of the senior party during the telephone
conversation which occurred prior to October 31, 1993, the
senior party thereby admitted knowledge of the junior party’s
concept by that date (Rosenthal Record page 151).
58. Conley testifies that, since at least as early as February 1991,
he has periodically provided senior party Magee with engraved
cylinders for manufacturing lenticular sheet (Rosenthal Record
pages 79-80), but that he was not a consultant for either the
junior or senior party (Rosenthal Record page 79).
59. Conley testifies that he has never communicated any
information received from either one of the junior party or the
senior party to the other (Rosenthal Record page 79).
60. Conley also states that he is particularly sure he did not
communicate any ideas or inventions received from the junior
party to any other person, and particularly not to the senior party
(Rosenthal Record page 82).
61. Conley further states that he received a number of telephone
calls from Rosenthal, as well as three written communications
(Rosenthal Record pages 81-82), but he testifies that he
received no disclosure of “a lenticular screen sheet having
17
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007