Interference No. 104,403 first surface has a plurality of parallel lenticulated conic lenses. The second surface which is disposed opposite to the first surface includes a plurality of spaced-apart raised parallel portions which have a composite image positioned thereupon with indented transparent concave lens portions therebetween. The concave lens portions permit the passage of light so that an image positioned beneath the transparent sheet at a preselected distance can be viewed through the transparent concave lens portions of the second surface. The subject matter of the count may be used in packaging. When the optical lens system of the count is used in packaging, a viewer can view the image (such as advertisement or labeling) on the raised parallel portions of the second surface when the viewer views the package at one angle and views an object (such as the contents of the package) beneath the sheet at a second angle. Rosenthal’s priority case Reduction to practice In order to prove actual reduction to practice, one must establish that a physical embodiment of the invention existed and that the physical embodiment included every limitation of the count and that it worked for its intended purpose. Correge v. Murphy, 705 F.2d 1326, 20Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007