14. In the redeclaration, Furman was accorded priority benefit of United Kingdom
application 9109506.7, filed 2 May 1991, as to counts 1, 2, and 3.
15. In the redeclaration, Belleau was accorded priority benefit of'.
(1) PCT/CA92/00001, filed 3 January 1992;
(2) GB 9109913.5, filed 7 May 1991; and
(3) GB 9100039.8, filed 3 January 1991
as to counts 1, 2, and 3.
16. Neither Furman nor Belleau requests reconsideration of our decision on preliminary
motions.
Prionrl
Furman's preliminarV statement:
17. According to Furman's preliminary statement, it conceived and reduced to practice the
invention of the counts by 19 July 1990 (Paper 102 and Paper 68).'
Fur-man's inventorship evidence:
18. A conference call was held on 22 January 2002.
19. Thereafter, an Order was entered in the interference (Paper 79). The Order summarized
the conference call as follows:
Party Furman requested the call. During the call, Furman
stated it had come into possession of information that may have
some relevance to the inventorship of its involved application.
5 Furman refiled its original preliminary statement on 2 May 2002 after it could not
be located in the record.
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007