D. Redeclaration of Interference
This interference is herein re-declared to the following extent:
1. The parties' claims corresponding to the count are:
Lee: 1-6
Van Engelen: 1-3, 5-16, and 18-22
2. Van Engelen is accorded benefit for the purpose of priority of European Application
No. 95201409.0 (EP '409), filed 30 May 1995.
E. Judgment
Junior party van Engelen has not alleged a date of invention or conception with respect to
the subject matter of the count prior to the senior party's earliest accorded benefit date of 4 April
1995. Furthermore, van Engelen's preliminary motion 8, attacking the benefit accorded Lee is
denied. Accordingly, judgment is entered against junior party van Engelen. Itis
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is herein entered against
junior party GERARD VAN ENGELEN, CORNELIS D. VAN DIJK, JOHANNES M. M. VAN
KIMMENADE, and JAN VAN EIJK;
FURTHER ORDERED junior party GERARD VAN ENGELEN, CORNELIS D. VAN
-38-
Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007