SCHAENZER et al. V. KNIGHT - Page 2





                Interference No. 105,058                                                                                                          
                Schaenzer v. Knight                                                                                                               
                A. Backaround Facts                                                                                                               
                         I . This interference was declared on November 25, 2002.                                                                 
                         2. Junior party Schaenzer, whose real party in interest is Seagate Technology, LLC, is                                   
                involved on the basis of its Patent No. 5,831,797.                                                                                
                         3. Senior party Knight, whose real party in interest is TeraStor, is involved on the basis                               
                of its Application 09/262,83 1.                                                                                                   
                         4. The count of the interference is Count 1:                                                                             
                                 Claim I of Schaenzer's Patent No. 5,831,797                                                                      
                                                       or                                                                                         
                                 Claim 46 of Knight's Application 09/262,831                                                                      
                         5. As indicated in the Notice Declaring Interference (Paper No. 1), junior party                                         
                Schaenzer's claims 1- 15 were designated as corresponding to the count.                                                           
                         6. As indicated in the Notice Declaring Interference (Paper No. 1), senior party                                         
                Knight's claims 46-63 were designated as corresponding to the count.                                                              
                         7. On January 22, 2003, the Administrative Patent Judge (A-PJ) issued an order                                           
                directing the parties to propose several time periods including the time period within which to                                   
                file preliminary motions. (Paper No. 20)                                                                                          
                         8. On February 26, 2003, the parties proposed that preliminary motions be due on May                                     
                16, 2003, which proposal was approved by the APJ.                                                                                 






                                                                     - 2 -                                                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007