Interference No. 105,058
Schaenzer v. Knight
9. On May 15, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a first extension of the time for filing
preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement. The
due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to June 6, 2003. Paper No. 24.
10. On June 6, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a second extension of the time for
filing preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement.
The due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to June 20, 2003. Paper No. 25.
11. On June 20, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a third extension of the time for
filing preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement.
The due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to July 11, 2003. Paper No. 26.
12. On July 11, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a fourth extension of the time for
filing preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement.
The due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to July 25, 2003. Paper No. 27.
13. On July 25, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a fifth extension of the time for filing
preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement. The
due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to August 1, 2003. Paper No. 28.
14. On August 1, 2003, the parties jointly obtained a sixth extension of the time for
filing preliminary motions, on the ground of needing time to review a draft settlement agreement.
The due date for filing preliminary motions was pushed back to August 8, 2003. Paper No. 29.
15. On August 11, the parties filed an interference settlement agreement pursuant to
37 CFR § 1.666.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007