Appeal No. 1998-0936
Application 08/369,011 Page 8
rejection of claims 7, 8, 16, and 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is
therefore reversed.
We turn next to the rejection of claims 6 and 14 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Auerbach in view of
Zalenski. We reverse the rejection of these claims because
Zalenski does not make up for the basic deficiencies of Auerbach.
We turn next to the rejection of claim 5 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Auerbach in view of Brienza. We
reverse the rejection of this claim because Brienza does not make
up for the basic deficiencies of Auerbach.
We turn next to the rejection of claims 6 and 14 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Auerbach in view of
Ogasahara. We reverse the rejection of these claims because
Ogasahara does not make up for the basic deficiencies of
Auerbach.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007