Appeal No. 1999-1349
Application No. 08/110,115 Page 7
components A along with other additives including dispersing
agents and other auxiliaries. See column 4 of Bargigia.
Like appellants, we fail to see how the disparate teachings
of Bargigia is combinable with Seney in any manner, let alone in
a manner that would result in appellants’ composition. Nor has
the examiner fairly established that Bargigia alone would have
suggested appellants’ composition or methods of using same.
While Bargigia may refer to some fluorinated propellants and
refer to the possible use of a variety of dispersing aids such as
water and organic solvents, including alcohols, the examiner has
not convincingly explained how the referenced passages in columns
2 and 4 of Bargigia would have suggested a composition with the
specified amounts of ethyl alcohol and amounts of specified hydro
fluorocarbons as here claimed.
Similarly, the examiner has not established how the other
applied references would make up for the deficiencies of the
teachings of Seney and Bargigia with respect to the here claimed
subject matter. Consequently, for the reasons set forth above
and in appellants’ briefs, we will not sustain any of the
examiner’s § 103 rejections.
CONCLUSION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007