Appeal No. 1999-1349
Application No. 08/110,115 Page 8
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-6 and 8-12
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being indefinite for
failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
subject matter which applicants regard as invention; to reject
claims 1 and 8-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Seney in view of Bargigia; to reject claim 2 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Seney in view of Bargigia and
Remington; to reject claims 3-6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Seney in view of Bargigia, Remington and McDow;
and to reject claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Seney in view of Bargigia, Remington and
Heiskel is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007