LAUDANO et al v. DANA-FARBER - Page 9




                Interference No. 104,717                                                                       Paper 30                  
                Laudano v. Dana-Farber Cancer Inst., Inc.                                                        Page 9                  
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the administrative                                    
                record of Laudano's 08/146,235 application and DFCI's 5,599,681 patent.                                                  



                                                     RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                                                  
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         
                                                                                                BOARD OF PATENT                          
                                                                                                   APPEALS AND                           
                                                     RICHARD TORCZON                              INTERFERENCES                          
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         
                                                                                                  INTERFERENCE                           
                                                                                                  TRIAL SECTION                          
                                                     CAROL A. SPIEGEL                                                                    
                                                     Administrative Patent Judge                                                         





















                Notice:  Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral agreements        
                referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of the interference, shall be in writing
                and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office before termination of the interference as 
                between said parties to the agreement or understanding.  35 U.S.C. 135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.                            


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007