The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 23 Filed by: Merits Panel Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Filed P.O. Box 1450 5 August 2003 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ JAMES A. HOXIE, Junior Party1 (Patent No. 5,994,515), v. YI LI and STEVEN M. RUBEN, Senior Party2 (Application No. 09/339,912). _______________ Patent Interference 105,059 (NAGUMO) _______________ Before: LEE, TIERNEY, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. NAGUMO, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Upon consideration of the REQUEST BY HOXIE UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662 (Paper 22), it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the 1 Hoxie has been accorded benefit for priority of its filing date, June 25, 1997. 2 Li has been accorded benefit for priority of parent application 08/466,343 (filed June 6, 1995, now U.S. Patent No. 6,025,154).Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007