sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior party
HOXIE.
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party HOXIE is not entitled
to a patent containing claims 1–5, 7, and 8 (corresponding to
Count 1)3 of patent 5,994,515.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made
of record in files of application 09/339,912 and U.S. Patent
5,994,515.
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement
agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR
§ 1.661.
______________________________
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge ))) BOARD OF PATENT
______________________________) APPEALS AND
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )) INTERFERENCE
) TRIAL SECTION
______________________________)
MARK NAGUMO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
3 The statement that Hoxie's claims 6 and 8 do not correspond to the
count (Paper 1 at 5) contains a typographical error: claim 8 corresponds to
the count; claim 9 does not correspond to the count.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007