The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte XIANG YU YAO __________ Appeal No. 2001-1821 Application 09/098,311 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before GARRIS, OWENS and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING The appellant requests reconsideration of our decision mailed on October 9, 2002, wherein we affirmed the rejection of claims 14-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Ravi in view of Bartha. The appellant argues that our decision fails to provide a motivation for making an apparatus having a mixed frequency RF generator and sources of silicon and carbon, and a reasonable expectation of success in doing so (request, page 2). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007