Ex Parte GLATT - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                          
                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                         Paper No. 36                
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                            Ex parte TERRY L. GLATT                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                       
                                              Appeal No. 1999-0034                                                   
                                            Application No. 08/568,402                                               
                                                  ____________                                                       

             Before KRASS,1 BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               




                                         ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                    
                    This is in response to appellant’s request that we reconsider our decision mailed                
             November 26, 2002, wherein we sustained the final rejection of claims 1-24 and 26-36.                   
             However, appellant’s arguments fail to convince us that we erred in any respect in the                  
             decision.  We therefore decline to make any changes therein.                                            






                    1  Administrative Patent Judge Lall retired from the USPTO before this case was reached for      
             rehearing.  Legal support for substituting one Board member for another can be found in In re Bose Corp.,
             772 F.2d 866, 869, 227 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985).                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007