The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TERRY L. GLATT ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0034 Application No. 08/568,402 ____________ Before KRASS,1 BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is in response to appellant’s request that we reconsider our decision mailed November 26, 2002, wherein we sustained the final rejection of claims 1-24 and 26-36. However, appellant’s arguments fail to convince us that we erred in any respect in the decision. We therefore decline to make any changes therein. 1 Administrative Patent Judge Lall retired from the USPTO before this case was reached for rehearing. Legal support for substituting one Board member for another can be found in In re Bose Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 869, 227 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007