Appeal No. 1999-0034
Application No. 08/568,402
claim 10, for the reason that the pan and tilt position of the master camera would be
based on the signal representative of the location of the object.
Although appellant’s request for rehearing appears to reargue the position set
out in the briefs, rather than stating points believed to have been misapprehended or
overlooked in rendering our decision, we have granted appellant’s request to the extent
of reconsidering the decision mailed November 26, 2002. However, we deny the
request with respect to making any changes therein.
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007