Ex Parte Llorin et al. - Page 9


               Appeal No.  2002-0780                                        Page      9                  
               Application No.  09/128,340                                                                  
                            Also since surfactants are well known in the art to reduce                      
                      surface tension, the reduced surface tension of the liquid containing                 
                      the cells is the result expected of a liquid containing a surfactant.                 
                      Thus, the reduced surface tension of the liquid is merely an                          
                      expected successful result.  Because this result is obtained by an                    
                      obvious modification of the prior art, the reduction in surface                       
                      tension of the liquid is obvious.                                                     
               The purpose of this cryptic discussion on surface tension is unclear.  It may be             
               that the examiner’s statement implies a reference back to her statement (Answer,             
               page 4), “Buck describes Triton X-100 and Tween to be useful for cell disruption.            
               These are well known surfactants in the art.”  The buffer solutions of Buck,                 
               however, were not used in Buck’s sonication method.  Instead, the cells in Buck’s            
               sonication method were suspended in distilled water.  Similarily, Robson                     
               discloses the use of buffer solutions for their heat lysis method3, but use water in         
               the sonication methods exemplified.                                                          
                      Therefore, while buffer solutions containing detergents such as Tween 20              
               are mentioned in Buck and Robson we are unable to identify any suggestion to                 
               use these solutions in a method of sonication.  While a person of ordinary skill in          
               the art may possess the requisite knowledge and ability to modify the protocol               
               taught by the prior art, the modification is not obvious unless the prior art                
               suggested the desirability of the modification.  In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902,            
               211 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  On this record the examiner identified                
               detergents and buffers in the prior art relied upon but has failed to provide any            


                                                                                                            
               3 Robson, column 6, lines 26-30 (“[i]n the most basic embodiment of the invention a sample … 
               containing the intracellular components desired is heated to obtain readily useable components.
               The organism to be lysed can be in H2O, but also can be in suitable buffers…and detergents   
               such as 0.5% Tween 20 and 0.5% Nonident P-40.”).                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007