Ex Parte YAMAZAKI et al - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2000-1642                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/104,264                                                                                  

              Yamazaki (Yamazaki '663)                   55-50663                     Apr. 12, 1980                       
                     (Japanese Kokai Patent Application)2                                                                 
              A. Madan et al. (Madan), Investigation Of The Density Of Localized States In a-Si Using                     
              The Field Effect Technique, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 20, pp. 239-257 (1976).                       
              LeComber et al. (LeComber), Amorphous-Silicon Field-Effect Device and Possible                              
              Application, Electronics Letters Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 179-181 (Mar. 15, 1979).                                
              Matsumura et al. (Matsumura), a-Si FET IC integrated on a glass substrate (with                             
              English translation (5 pages)), National Convention Record, The Institute of Electronics                    
              and Communication Engineers of Japan, p. 2-287 et seq. (Mar. 1980).                                         
                     Claims 81-90, 92, and 96-98 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                            
              unpatentable over Matsumura, Yamazaki '330, LeComber, Ovshinsky, Madan, and                                 
              Yamazaki '663.                                                                                              
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 53) and the Examiner’s Answer                             
              (Paper No. 61) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No.                       
              58) and the Reply Brief (Paper No. 63) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims                  
              which stand rejected.                                                                                       


                                                       OPINION                                                            
                     This case turns on substantially the same issues that were before this panel of                      
              the board in an earlier appeal in a related application (Appeal No. 1999-1466,                              
              Application No. 08/371,486).  In that appeal we were persuaded by the appellants that                       



                     2 With English translation provided by the USPTO, dated Jul. 2000.                                   
                                                           -3-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007