Ex Parte CASHMAN et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 16              
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                  Ex parte RUSSELL P. CASHMAN and RICHARD A. SCHWARTZ                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2001-1563                                 
                              Application No. 09/151,580                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and GROSS, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 3, 6 through 10, and 16.  The                 
          examiner has objected to claims 4 and 5 as containing allowable             
          subject matter but being dependent from rejected base claims.               
          Claims 11 through 15 and 17 have been canceled.                             
               Appellants' invention relates to a wireless communication              
          system which switches between data communication and voice                  
          communication.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention,           
          and it reads as follows:                                                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007