Appeal No. 2001-1787
Application 09/374,122
In light of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 1 through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated
by Handweller is not sustained. The examiner’s decision to reject
claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Sprowls is
also not sustained. Thus, the decision of the examiner is
reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:pgg
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007