Appeal No. 2002-0716
Application 09/092,255
a demultiplexer, for extracting from said video information
stream said plurality of substantially full dynamic range encoded
video signal components; and
a plurality of standard compression decoders responding to
at least inter frame coding each standard compression decoder
comprising a substantially full dynamic range decoding channel
and a plurality of partial dynamic range decoding channels, each
standard decoder being associated with a respective substantially
full dynamic range encoded video signal component, each standard
compression encoder decoding, using said respective substantially
full dynamic range decoding channel, said respective
substantially full dynamic range encoded video signal component
to produce a respective substantially full dynamic range decoded
video signal component.
References
The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:
Heyl 5,486,929 Jan 23, 1996
Tanaka 5,541,739 Jul. 30, 1996
Naimpally 5,589,993 Dec. 31, 1996
Enari (EPO) 0,649,261 A2 Apr. 19, 1995
Rejections at Issue
Claims 29, 31, 33 through 39, 46 through 53, 56, 59 through
66, 69, 72 through 76, 78 and 79 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Heyl, Tanaka and Naimpally.
Claims 30, 32, 54, 57, 67, 70 and 77 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Heyl, Tanaka and
Naimpally in view of Enari.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007