The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANDERS HULTGREN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0819 Application No. 09/047,5331 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-7, 11-16, 18, 19, 21, 27, 29-34, 36- 40, 42, 44-80. Claims 4, 8-10, 17, 20, 22-26, 28, 35, 41 and 43 have been canceled. We reverse. 1 Application for patent filed March 25, 1998, which claims the filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Provisional Applications 60/043,610, filed April 15, 1997 and 60/049,774, filed June 16, 1997.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007