Appeal No. 2002-1308
Application No. 09/161,787
independent claims 16 and 20 are systems which correspond to the
method steps of claims 1 and 10, we cannot sustain the
obviousness rejection of claims 16, 20, and their dependents,
claims 17 through 19.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 20
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
APG/vsh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007