The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WINDSOR WEE SUN HSU, SHAUCHI ONG
and HONESTY CHENG YOUNG
________________
Appeal No. 2002-1314
Application 09/412,902
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 and 18-20.
Claims 1-8, 10-17 and 21-25 were indicated to contain allowable
subject matter by the examiner. In response to the appellants’
appeal brief, the examiner has indicated that claims 18-20 now
contain allowable subject matter [supplemental answer, page 2].
Therefore, the only claim remaining in this appeal is claim 9.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007