Ex Parte HSU et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1314                                                        
          Application 09/412,902                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to a computer-                             
          implemented method for clustering related pages in close physical           
          proximity on a data storage medium.  The data pages are clustered           
          by identifying relationships between the pages that are                     
          established by more than time of page access.                               
          Sole claim 9 is reproduced as follows:                                      
               A computer-implemented method for clustering related data              
          pages in close physical proximity on a data storage medium,                 
          comprising:                                                                 
               identifying relationships between the pages, the                       
          relationships being established by more than time of page access;           
          and                                                                         
               clustering the pages based on the relationships.                       
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Courts et al. (Courts)        5,394,537          Feb. 28, 1995              
          Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                         
          being anticipated by the disclosure of Courts.                              
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence             
          of anticipation relied upon by the examiner as support for the              

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007