Appeal No. 2002-1326
Application 09/152,759
linking said primary time interval and said adjacent
secondary time interval within said single dedicated radio
frequency channel to permit the sequent processing of said voice
and non-voice data as a single transmitted unit over said single
dedicated radio frequency channel.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Merakos et al. (Merakos) 5,521,925 May 28, 1996
Dent et al. (Dent) 5,896,375 Apr. 20, 1999
(filed July 23, 1996)
Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Merakos in view of
Dent.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s
rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal
set forth in the examiner’s answer.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007