Appeal No. 2002-1326 Application 09/152,759 transmitted unit. The examiner simply asserts that the applied prior art teaches the claimed invention, but the examiner’s findings appear to be nothing more than mere speculation and conjecture. Since we cannot find support in the applied prior art for the examiner’s rejection, we do not sustain the rejection based on this record. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-18 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS/ki -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007