Ex Parte SEZAN - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2002-1460                                                        
          Application 09/040,510                                                      

               Appellant’s independent claim 1 is representative of the               
          claimed invention and is hereby reproduced as follows:                      
               1.  An image acquisition system, comprising:                           
               an image sensor for sensing an image and generating an image           
          signal therefor;                                                            
               a histogram computation mechanism for generating, on-line, a           
          computed histogram from said image signal;                                  
               a storage mechanism for persistently storing said image                
          signal and said computed histogram; and                                     
               a linking mechanism for linking said image signal and said             
          computed histogram associated therewith.                                    
                                   References                                         
          The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                    
               Alkofer                  4,677,465           Jun. 30, 1987             
               Zhang et al. (Zhang)     5,635,982           Jun.  3, 1997             
               Daly                     5,150,433           Sep. 22, 1992             
            Rejections at Issue                                                       
               Claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 through 15, 17, 18, 20, 22, and           
          23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by             
          Alkofer.  Claims 7, 12, 16, 21, 24 and 25 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Alkofer in view of               
          Zhang.  Claims 10 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Alkofer in view of Daly.  Claims 26                 
          through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                    

                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007