Appeal No. 2002-1460
Application 09/040,510
Furthermore, we note that Zhang and Daly fail to teach these
limitations. Thus, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for the reasons set forth above.
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 through 15,
17, 18, 20, 22, and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. Furthermore, we
have not sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 7, 10, 12,
16, 19, 21, and 24 through 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007