Appeal No. 2002-1576 Application No. 09/426,516 not established a prima facie case of anticipation of the invention claimed in independent claims 11 and 17, we cannot sustain the rejection of independent claims 11 and 17 and their dependent claims 13-16, 20 and 22-25. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 11, 13-17, 20 and 22-25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed. REVERSED MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JLD/vsh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007