Appeal No. 2002-1578 Application No. 08/814,928 programming operation to a specific location, the system processor has an opportunity to request that a data modification operation to another memory location be performed while the programming operation is suspended. Representative claim 31 is reproduced as follows: 31. A memory device, comprising: a memory array; a register to store at least one bit indicating a suspend status of a write operation for the memory array; and a control circuit coupled to said memory array and said register, said control circuit to update said register and to control an output of a status signal representing said suspend status of said write operation, and wherein said control circuit includes: a first state machine to receive commands for accessing said memory array or said register, and a second state machine coupled to said first state machine and to execute the commands received by said first state machine. The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:1 Terada et al. (Terada) 5,561,628 Oct. 01, 1996 Leak et al. (Leak) 5,937,424 Aug. 10, 1999 (filed Feb. 27, 1997) Claims 31-37, all of the appealed claims, stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Appellants’ admitted 1 In addition, the Examiner relies on Appellants’ admissions as to the prior art at pages 1-3 of Appellants’ specification. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007