Ex Parte DALVI et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1578                                                        
          Application No. 08/814,928                                                  


          programming operation to a specific location, the system processor          
          has an opportunity to request that a data modification operation to         
          another memory location be performed while the programming                  
          operation is suspended.                                                     
               Representative claim 31 is reproduced as follows:                      
          31.  A memory device, comprising:                                           
               a memory array;                                                        
               a register to store at least one bit indicating a suspend              
          status of a write operation for the memory array; and                       
               a control circuit coupled to said memory array and said                
          register, said control circuit to update said register and to               
          control an output of a status signal representing said suspend              
          status of said write operation, and wherein said control circuit            
          includes:                                                                   
               a first state machine to receive commands for accessing said           
          memory array or said register, and                                          
               a second state machine coupled to said first state machine and         
          to execute the commands received by said first state machine.               
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:1            
          Terada et al. (Terada)        5,561,628           Oct. 01, 1996             
          Leak et al. (Leak)            5,937,424           Aug. 10, 1999             
                                                  (filed Feb. 27, 1997)               
               Claims 31-37, all of the appealed claims, stand rejected under         
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Appellants’ admitted          


               1 In addition, the Examiner relies on Appellants’ admissions as to the 
          prior art at pages 1-3 of Appellants’ specification.                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007