The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte Kenneth E. Flick
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1830
Application No. 09/583,257
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through
8 and 11 through 44. Claims 9 and 10 are objected to as being
dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if
rewritten in independent claim form including all of the
limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007